TR2016-171
The Third 'CHIME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Analysis and Outcomes
-
- "The Third 'CHIME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Analysis and Outcomes", Computer Speech & Language, DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2016.10.005, December 2016.BibTeX TR2016-171 PDF
- @article{Barker2016dec,
- author = {Barker, Jon and Marxer, Ricard and Vincent, Emmanuel and Watanabe, Shinji},
- title = {The Third 'CHIME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Analysis and Outcomes},
- journal = {Computer Speech \& Language},
- year = 2016,
- month = dec,
- publisher = {Elsevier},
- doi = {10.1016/j.csl.2016.10.005},
- url = {https://www.merl.com/publications/TR2016-171}
- }
,
- "The Third 'CHIME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Analysis and Outcomes", Computer Speech & Language, DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2016.10.005, December 2016.
-
Research Areas:
Abstract:
This paper presents the design and outcomes of the CHiME-3 challenge, the first open speech recognition evaluation designed to target the increasingly relevant multichannel, mobile-device speech recognition scenario. The paper serves two purposes. First, it provides a definitive reference for the challenge, including full descriptions of the task design, data capture and baseline systems along with a description and evaluation of the 26 systems that were submitted. The best systems re-engineered every stage of the baseline resulting in reductions in word error rate from 33.4% to as low as 5.8%. By comparing across systems, techniques that are essential for strong performance are identified. Second, the paper considers the problem of drawing conclusions from evaluations that use speech directly recorded in noisy environments. The degree of challenge presented by the resulting material is hard to control and hard to fully characterise. We attempt to dissect the various 'axes of difficulty' by correlating various estimated signal properties with typical system performance on a per session and per utterance basis. We find strong evidence of a dependence on signal-to-noise ratio and channel quality. Systems are less sensitive to variations in the degree of speaker motion. The paper concludes by discussing the outcomes of CHiME-3 in relation to the design of future mobile speech recognition evaluations.